| Below is an audio version of the sermon--press the "play" button to begin the audio, but do allow a few seconds for the audio to begin. |

| Matthew 15:10-28 August 14, 2011 Then he called the crowd to him and said to them, ‘Listen and understand: it is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a person, but it is what comes out of the mouth that defiles.’ Then the disciples approached and said to him, ‘Do you know that the Pharisees took offence when they heard what you said?’ He answered, ‘Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be uprooted. Let them alone; they are blind guides of the blind. And if one blind person guides another, both will fall into a pit.’ But Peter said to him, ‘Explain this parable to us.’ Then he said, ‘Are you also still without understanding? Do you not see that whatever goes into the mouth enters the stomach, and goes out into the sewer? But what comes out of the mouth proceeds from the heart, and this is what defiles. For out of the heart come evil intentions, murder, adultery, fornication, theft, false witness, slander. These are what defile a person, but to eat with unwashed hands does not defile.’ Jesus left that place and went away to the district of Tyre and Sidon. Just then a Canaanite woman from that region came out and started shouting, ‘Have mercy on me, Lord, Son of David; my daughter is tormented by a demon.’ But he did not answer her at all. And his disciples came and urged him, saying, ‘Send her away, for she keeps shouting after us.’ He answered, ‘I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.’ But she came and knelt before him, saying, ‘Lord, help me.’ He answered, ‘It is not fair to take the children’s food and throw it to the dogs.’ She said, ‘Yes, Lord, yet even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters’ table.’ Then Jesus answered her, ‘Woman, great is your faith! Let it be done for you as you wish.’ And her daughter was healed instantly. I think I’ve shared with you the name of name of Ludwig Wittgenstein, the Briish philosopher, in another context, in a sermon I preached some years. Wittgenstein was born in 1889, the youngest of 8 children, to a wealthy Prussian family, though it was troubled family–three of his four brothers eventually committed suicide. He essentially trained himself as a philosopher after World War I, inherited his family fortune, and subsequently gave it all away. Wittgenstein wrote one or two major books, became an elementary school teacher, and then eventually taught at Cambridge in England. Though he was given a Catholic baptism and burial, he never practiced his faith, but the language of faith always fascinated him. He believed that it was important to pay attention to our language, to the way we humans use words and the way those very words create worlds—emotional, spiritual, and philosophical worlds. To pay attention to language, and to the human language games we participate in, as Wittgenstein called it, is to pay attention to the world itself, for the logic within the language creates the world as each of us knows it and experiences it. One of his more familiar and famous sayings is this: “the limits of my language means the limits of my world” and that if we want to understand the world, we must come to understand the power of language as we humans use it to create meaning for ourselves. And I’ve often said something similar when I do some training around systems theory in congregations: give people a language and you give them a world and way of understanding what is happening to them. Now, It has always struck me as true, this understanding of the power of language, though I am pretty sure I’ve not always understood or been as self-aware as Wittgenstein was regarding the meaning-making power of language. But it seems true, and our text from the Gospel of Matthew today also seems to hint at that truth, that the words we use carry great power—in fact, the language we use carries the power to change us, to transform us, and maybe, most radically, maybe it even has the power to transform God. I’ ll get to what I mean by this in a second, but I want us to look at these two texts before us this morning, one that specifically talks about the power of language and words, and the other where we see words being exchanged between two human beings, and the transformation that happens for both Jesus and this strong-willed, powerful Canaanite woman in that conversation. In the narrative right before he begins speaking here, Jesus has taken on the religious elders around him for being selective in the way they apply the religious law they have been given by God, and he uses the example of how parents are treated by some of these people, calling them out for being, essentially, hypocrites. And yet, there seems to be a sense throughout his criticisms of the religious elders in the Gospels that he doesn’t want to eradicate the religious laws that formed much of Jewish life, as much as he hopes to remind people that the point of following the rules is to transform the heart, not to simply follow the rules. Jesus criticism’s here is nothing new, and certainly was not extraordinary in the sense that Jewish thinkers during Jesus’ time and subsequent centuries have always called people to the heart of the matter, which is not the rules themselves, the religious law given by and through Moses, but the truth behind the rules, what the rule itself hints at, the life lived out in the following of the religious rules. And yet here, Jesus seems to be challenging all of the tradition, by saying that it is not what we put into our mouths that makes us unclean, that makes us spiritually dirty, a belief that directly challenges the dietary laws of his own tradition. Instead, he says, it is what comes out of our mouths, the language and the words, that really expose our hearts, that exposes that world within each of us, that place full of shadow and light, full of mixed motives and good intentions, that makes us unclean. And, as I hinted at earlier, Jesus seems to be all over the map when it comes to religious laws of his day, but here he is clear: the words we use, the language we employ to tell our stories, or even to tell the stories of others, they reveal more about us than even our actions in this world, what we eat, what rules we do follow and don’t follow. Words expose our hearts, they reveal our insecurities, they make known what we really think, what we really believe, beyond the niceties and appropriateness of our actions—words, language, they reveal an inner world, maybe the only world that matters, where both human goodness and human evil dance together. The complexity of our lives, and even the complexity of our motives, they get eventually get “outed” by our words, our language, how we say what we say about ourselves, and about others, even about the larger universe. And that is a problem, isn’t it, this challenge to listen ourselves, to really listen to the stories we are telling, so that we can see the world we are creating with our words, to see the world inner world reflected in the words we speak out into the universe. The good news is that we get an illustration of how language is powerful and life changing right after Jesus words on the power of language. What we have is this story of a woman who uses language well—in fact, she uses so powerfully that it changes every one around here, including this Jesus of Nazareth, this itinerant preacher who has now found himself in her neck of the woods. She is a Canaanite woman—in the Gospel of Mark she is named as the Syrophoenician women, which automatically makes her an outsider to the Jewish people, Jesus’ people. The narrator says she has come to out of the crowd, after this piece where Jesus talks about the power of words, she comes out of the crowd shouting—and that is right word here—she screams, she begs for the healing of her daughter, tortured, she believes, by a demon, by something outside of herself. “Have mercy on me, Lord, Son of David,” are her words—these words are familiar to us because they have been used for centuries in the church’s Mass, to appeal to God for mercy and presence. She is bold beyond her status—she is a woman, she has no right to speak to a man directly in this culture, but this does not stop her—she does not whisper her request, her demand is loud and annoying, her voice, her words, her language trembling with desperation and emotion. But more stunning than the loudness of the pleas is the silence that comes from Jesus—he ignores her, and the narrator makes it obvious that he ignores her because the disciples have to finally ask him to tell her to go away—“if you’re not going to do anything, then get rid of her,” they seem to be saying to Jesus. I mean, the picture of Jesus here in this passage is disturbing, and yes, Jesus gives us a reason moments later for ignoring her— his mission is first to the people of Israel, and then everyone else, the Gentiles, an argument you see echoed in the later writings of the New Testament, especially Paul’s letter to the church at Rome. Still, there is something distressing here about seeing our picture of the gentle, loving Jesus challenged by what we see here in this story, the seeming coldness of Jesus’ reaction to this woman’s request to him to heal her daughter. But she will not be ignored, she will not stop speaking, her voice and the needs of her daughter will not be ignored, and she responds by kneeling before him, begging him for his mercy—but, again, Jesus responds by pointing out that his mission is to his people first, that to be fair, the best is to go those whom he has been first sent to share the good news with, the Jewish people—and the term he uses here to describe the non-Jews, the Gentiles here, the word “dog” is actually stronger, more insulting than in the original language than the English translation here conveys. But she won’t give up—she responds with her own words, her own language—she fiercely believes in the possibility of what this one from Nazareth can do for her daughter—and she makes her case that even the dogs deserve the scraps from the table. She challenges Jesus, she seeks to change his mind, she argues her case, she uses language to change her world, and maybe shift the world of this man from Nazareth, whose passion for his own people has perhaps blinded him to the need of others, people who are in as much need of good news and healings as the people who are his own. It’s a startling moment, really, this conversation between Jesus and this Canaanite woman because it reminds us of the power of language, and how powerful it may really be in this world, in this universe. Let me explain myself, if that really possible. Generally, in the Christian tradition, it is believed that some sort of revelation happened in the life of this Jesus of Nazareth, and though we Christians for centuries have disagreed about what that revelation is and was—certainly, that diversity is reflected right here in this place, at this church, in the many ways we understand the life and meaning of this One we follow. But I’ve often wondered if the revelation that has come to us through this Jesus didn’t actually go both ways? I mean, what if we humans revealed as much to God as God revealed to us through this Jesus, some two thousands of years ago? What if God learned as much about us humans as we learned about God in and through the life of this Jesus? To have a relationship implies the possibility of change, for both sides of the relationship—in fact, there must be that openness to change for anything to go forward in any relationship, because life is change, good and bad, and usually both at the same time. And if that is the case, what does this moment mean, this exchange between Jesus and the Canaanite woman? I think it might mean many things, but I do think, for me, it means this first and foremost: that language has the power change the world, and most certainly it has the power to change our lives, and it may even have the power to change God. Because this woman will not let go, because she knows and believes that the gift of what this Jewish preacher brings includes her, she has shifted the world, the universe, for herself, and maybe even shifted and changed the world of the one she kneels before—perhaps this Jesus too has been converted. “In the beginning was the Word,” John writes at the beginning of his Gospel, and out of the Word came all of creation—great power to create, to renew, to transform. In the passage, this powerful woman, this outsider is credited by Jesus as having great faith—her passionate words, her conversation with him has convinced him that she has something he has rarely seen in his travels, and that is faith—but here’s the kicker: is this what faith looks like—persistent, demanding, relentless in the face of silence? In her conversation with Jesus, in the words she has used and the world she has created by that persistent demand to be in dialogue, to be in conversation with God, she is named as faithful—not the disciples, she is the one named having the kind of faith that can move mountains—maybe she even moved God. I don’t know, but I think all of this should remind us that our words, and the lives we create by the words we use, they need our attention. Language, words, this is powerful stuff, it is the building block of creation, and if so, we ought to pay attention to the world each of us creating through own words. Amen. |